Rated 2.3 out of 5 by 3
Rated 1 out of 5 by Princess2011 Didn't like
it didn't give me the stomach coverage that I was looking for, the bottom legs rolled up.
August 14, 2014
Rated 3 out of 5 by dresscat loose legs!
These offer good hold on the body, but the legs are cut too loose.
I don't live in the US and the postage was so expensive, I would have spent too much to return them.
So I fixed them myself, I tried to sew along the inside seam, it did not take a long time and now fit just fine.
I wear them with body con dresses and like them ( now).
Spanx, if you are listening, the other lady had the same problem, why not cut the legs a little tighter?
March 9, 2014
Rated 3 out of 5 by MelB218 Fits Great Except for the Legs
So I'll start off by saying that I am 5'1 and about 120 (I think) as of now. I wear shape-wear due to medical reasons pertaining to the nerves. I have to buy shape-wear that is fairly snug to be comfortable so I wear these under ALL of my work clothes.
I have been buying the In-Power High-Waist, Shape-wear with Footless panty hose for years because you don't have to worry about rolling, but I wanted something for shorts...
I might as well have bought the version of this without shorts. I put them on and was very happy until I realized the legs were hanging off me. I was very disappointed. I like buying shape-wear with legs because you never have to worry about exaggerated panty lines, but the fact that the legs weren't doing anything, and basically a useless add-on, ruined it for me. Now I know that I am not over weight, but I have a bit of a thick thigh, this shouldn't have had that much extra room to it.
This was a waste. I will be returning unfortunately.
P.S. If you don't care about the legs, buy the ones without.
October 30, 2013